In your submitted work, you explore the idea of alternate timelines of history and alternate versions of history, specifically looking at marginalised histories and how we can think about alternative versions of history. What drives that approach and what do you hope the audience can take from that?
I alternate history because a lot of it is usually controlled by politics. I remember when Project Gutenberg [a volunteer effort to digitize and archive cultural works, as well as to encourage the creation and distribution of eBooks] happened and then, the internet came along. We now have more access to the literature of the times. There are all these different alternate versions of history, from stories that have been suppressed or outright banned, that have made their way into various groupings of libraries. We can see the prevailing narrative and also look at the alternative narratives that existed. They didn’t emerge in the sense that I’ve created an alternate universe – these alternative narratives were always there.
I don’t really stray too far from the prescribed history that we know, but I include some of the newer things I’ve learned along the way. And that’s to make history not look so much like a monolith. We’re human beings, we’re doomed to repeat history because it’s everyone’s least favourite subject.
I try to expand people’s minds. Interestingly enough, now there’s a lot of false history that gets put on social media, and everybody goes to that. They’re talking about things they have absolutely no knowledge about because you have to study the canon first, and then you move on into the actual histories that were recorded.
For instance, there’s François Le Vaillant. He was a French historian, painter and writer who went to Cape Town, and his stories are totally different from the prescribed narrative for that place. He went and talked to the people there, and then later in the 19th century, you have German Princes roaming the Wild West in America. There are always going to be alternative histories, you just have to find them.
But what I do is combine them all to make a trinity: past, present, and future all condensed into one space. And that is accurate – historically accurate.